“…despite their already high levels of fitness” the athletes were “able to significantly enhance their level of strength.” One key benefit EMS had on these athletes was the significant increase in their gains. This review shined light on some surprising results. A range of studies has found that an electronic signal must be powerful enough to “…obtain muscular contractions in excess of 60% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)” and should “…be in the range of 60-80% of MVC to induce changes.”Īn extensive review looked at nearly 100 studies relating to the effects of EMS on the physical performance of elite athletes.Īfter 3 to 6 weeks of EMS use, various performance aspects improved for these athletes such as their: It is also worth considering the voltage used in the ab belts from these studies. Such questions can only be answered with more extensive research on a wider scale. Consequently, these tests couldn’t answer whether an ab belt could send electronic signals through various inches of fat or if they work better on slimmer individuals.
![ab stimulator belt ab stimulator belt](https://dhammatek.in/market/Shenzhen/Neeraj/Abs/4.jpg)
![ab stimulator belt ab stimulator belt](https://image-us.bigbuy.win/upload/image/assistant/1411200323911/1411200323911-12.jpg)
![ab stimulator belt ab stimulator belt](https://mikinutrition.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/37-ohxjpa-300x300.jpg)
The 2005 study did not include anyone with a BMI of over 28 while the 2018 high-intensity ab belt trial’s participants all had an average BMI of 24.Ī BMI of 24 is considered a normal, average weight while 28 is deemed just slightly overweight. Therefore, the results for these participants could change drastically for hundreds or thousands of other people who purchase and use an ab stimulator belt.Īnother issue with the studies was that no one involved was severely overweight.